Publications

The list below is generated by processing submitted.bib.

2022

1. J. Contzen, T. Dickhaus, and G. Lohmann. Long-term temporal evolution of extreme temperature in a warming earth. arxiv preprint, 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13512.
2. A. Løkkegaard, K. Mankoff, C. Zdanowicz, G. D. Clow, M. P. Lüthi, S. Doyle, H. Thomsen, D. Fisher, J. Harper, A. Aschwanden, B. M. Vinther, D. Dahl-Jensen, H. Zekollari, T. Meierbachtol, I. McDowell, N. Humphrey, A. Solgaard, N. B. Karlsson, S. A. Khan, B. Hills, R. Law, B. Hubbard, P. Christoffersen, M. Jacquemart, R. S. Fausto, and W. T. Colgan. Greenland and canadian arctic ice temperature profiles. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2022:1–24, 2022. URL: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-138/, doi:10.5194/tc-2022-138.
3. R. Reese, J. Garbe, E. A. Hill, B. Urruty, K. A. Naughten, O. Gagliardini, G. Durand, F. Gillet-Chaulet, D. Chandler, P. M. Langebroek, and R. Winkelmann. The stability of present-day Antarctic grounding lines – Part B: Possible commitment of regional collapse under current climate. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2022:1–33, 2022. URL: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-105/, doi:10.5194/tc-2022-105.
4. B. Urruty, E. A. Hill, R. Reese, J. Garbe, O. Gagliardini, G. Durand, F. Gillet-Chaulet, G. H. Gudmundsson, R. Winkelmann, M. Chekki, D. Chandler, and P. M. Langebroek. The stability of present-day Antarctic grounding lines – Part A: No indication of marine ice sheet instability in the current geometry. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2022:1–34, 2022. URL: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-104/, doi:10.5194/tc-2022-104.

2021

1. C. Yue, L. S. Schmidt, L. Zhao, M. Wolovick, and J. C. Moore. Insensitivity of mass loss of icelandic vatnajökull ice cap to solar geoengineering. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2021:1–20, 2021. URL: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-318/, doi:10.5194/tc-2021-318.
2. M. Zeitz, R. Winkelmann, and A. Levermann. Implications of flow law uncertainty for flow-driven ice-loss in greenland under idealized warming pathways. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2021. URL: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~anders/publications/zeitz_winkelmann21.pdf.

2020

1. P. Gierz, L. Ackermann, C. B. Rodehacke, U. Krebs-Kanzow, C. Stepanek, D. Barbi, and G. Lohmann. Simulating interactive ice sheets in the multi-resolution awi-esm 1.2: a case study using scope 1.0. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2020:1–32, 2020. URL: https://gmd.copernicus.org/preprints/gmd-2020-159/, doi:10.5194/gmd-2020-159.
2. Z. Zhang, Q. Yan, R. Zhang, F. Colleoni, G. Ramstein, G. Dai, M. Jakobsson, M. O’Regan, S. Liess, D.-D. Rousseau, N. Wu, E. J. Farmer, C. Contoux, C. Guo, N. Tan, and Z. Guo. Rapid waxing and waning of beringian ice sheet reconcile glacial climate records from around north pacific. Climate of the Past Discussions, 2020:1–25, 2020. URL: https://cp.copernicus.org/preprints/cp-2020-38/, doi:10.5194/cp-2020-38.

2018

1. A. Winter, T. Kleiner, D. Steinhage, T. Creyts, and O. Eisen. Deducing large-scale age distribution and paleoaccumulation rates from radiostratigraphy in east antarctica. 2018. URL: https://d-nb.info/1164151959/34.

2015

1. M. A. Martin, A. Levermann, and R. Winkelmann. Comparing ice discharge through west antarctic gateways: weddell vs. amundsen sea warming. The Cryosphere Discussions, 9(2):1705–1733, 2015. URL: http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/9/1705/2015/.

2012

1. R. Winkelmann, A. Levermann, K. Frieler, and M. A. Martin. Uncertainty in future solid ice discharge from antarctica. The Cryosphere Discussions, 6(1):673–714, 2012. URL: http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/6/673/2012/.

2009

1. Ed Bueler, Constantine Khroulev, Andy Aschwanden, Ian Joughin, and Ben E. Smith. Modeled and observed fast flow in the Greenland ice sheet. 2009. URL: http://pism.github.io/uaf-iceflow/BKAJS_submit2_twocolumn.pdf.